ROLE OF CLINICAL AUTOPSIES IN ENSURING DIAGNOSIS CERTAINTY

  • MARINESCU Daniela Assistant Professor at the dicipline Pathological Anatomy, Department of Fundamental, Prophylactic and Clinical Sciences Faculty of Medicine ,,Transilvania” University of Brașov, Romania
  • NEICA Ligia Associate Professor at the dicipline Histopathology, Department of Fundamental, Prophylactic and Clinical Sciences Faculty of Medicine ,,Transilvania” University of Brașov, Romania
  • DIACONESCU Daniela Associate at the dicipline Professor Genetics, Department of Fundamental, Prophylactic and Clinical Sciences Faculty of Medicine,Transilvania” University of Brașov, Romania
  • ROGOZEA Liliana Professor at the dicipline Ethics and History of Medicine, Department of Fundamental, Prophylactic and Clinical Sciences Faculty of Medicine,Transilvania” University of Brașov, Romania
Keywords: autopsy, certainty of diagnosis, death, cause of death

Abstract

Clinical autopsies had an essential contribution in developing medical sciences and in medical educational process. Using data obtained from post-mortem examinations, autopsy can be considered as an a quality assesing tool for madical healthcare activity.

References

Tariq Ayoub, Jade Chow: The conventional autopsy in modern medicine. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 05/2008; 101(4):177-181. ·

Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003;289:2849–56

Roulson J, Benbow EW, Hasleton PS. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review. Histopathology. 2005 Dec;47(6):551-9.

Eriksson L, Sundstrom C. Decreasing autopsy rate în Sweden reflects changing attitudes among clinicians. 1993 Dec; 5(4): 319-23.

Start RD, McCulloch TA, Benbow EW, Lauder I, Underwood JCE. Clinical autopsy rates during the 1980s: the continuing decline. J Pathol 1993;171:63–6

Chariot P, Witt K, Pautot V, et at. Declining autopsy rate în a French hospital. Arch. Pathol.Lab.Med. 2000; 124: 739-45.

Nemesánszky E, Bajtai A. Relationship of the clinician and the pathologist at the turn of the millennium. Orv Hetil Journal2002;143:(16):813-7.8. Royal College of Pathologists of Auatralia Autopsy Working Party. The declinebof the hospital autopsy: a safety and quaqlity issues for health care in Australia. 2004 Mar 15; 180(6): 281-5

Burton JL, Underwood J. Clinical, educational and epidemiologic value of autopsy. Lancet 2007; 369:1471–80.

Hagestuen PO, Aase S. The organization and value of autopsies. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2012; 132:152–4.

Ong BB, Wong JJ, Hashim J. A retrospective study of the accuracy between clinical and autopsy cause of death in the University of Malaya Medical Centre. Malays J Pathol. 2004 Jun;26(1):35-41.

Tavora F, Crowder CD, Sun CC, Burke AP. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses. A comparison of university, community, and private autopsy practices. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008; 129:102-109

Beatrice Ioan, Teodora Alexa, Ioana-Dana Alexa Rom J Leg Med 2012; 20: 307-12

Silfvast T, Takkunen O, Kolho E, Andersson LC, Rosenberg P. Characteristics of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a 5-year review. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29:321-324.

Jurić G, Tentor D, Jakić-Razumović J. Autopsy findings and clinical diagnoses: retrospective study of 3,117 autopsies. Croat Med J. 1999 Mar;40(1):71-6.

Saad R, Yamada AT, Pereira da Rosa FH, Gutierrez PS, Mansur AJ. Comparison between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in a cardiology hospital. Heart. 2007 Nov;93(11):1414-9. Epub 2007 Mar 29.
Published
2015-04-30
Section
Original Article